Every case study shows the same pattern: a problem that required both financial rigour and technical execution. The outcomes are measured in pounds saved, not just systems delivered.
The platform was crashing during peak traffic—Friday nights were becoming a reputational nightmare. Legacy monolithic architecture couldn't handle the load. Meanwhile, London contractor costs were killing margins. They needed to migrate to cloud AND reduce costs. At the same time.
Achieved 99.99% platform availability during record transaction volumes and 40% reduction in blended engineering costs.
Nearshoring alone saved £4M+ annually in contractor costs. Auto-scaling architecture eliminated overprovisioning—paying only for compute used. The CFO got cost reduction; the CTO got a modern platform. Both from a single engagement.
The regulator had blocked the banking license application. Insufficient security controls. No audit trails in the deployment process. The next funding round—and £50M+ valuation—was at risk. They needed to fix the security posture fast, or the business model was dead.
Secured the Banking License ahead of schedule and closed a £50M Series C funding round.
A pure technologist would have built the security controls. But the real value was understanding what the regulator actually needed to approve the license—and structuring the remediation to unlock the £50M funding round. Technical fix, financial outcome.
As an MGA, underwriting is the core value—not claims. But the Principals were spending 60% of their time on simple operations. Information was cluttered across hundreds of broker emails. They couldn't delegate because the process was too messy, creating massive communication overhead.
Freed up 60% of Principals' capacity to focus on complex underwriting. Reduced communication overhead to near zero.
Principal time is the scarcest resource in an MGA. Every hour spent on admin is an hour not spent on underwriting decisions worth £100k+. The technology solution was simple; the value was understanding the business model well enough to know which problem to solve.
A landmark cultural complex of national importance required a digital experience to match its world-class physical premises. The ambition was high: unified platforms across web and mobile that would serve visitors before, during, and after their visit.
Delivered all three platforms (website, iPhone, Android) within 6 months. The digital experience now matches the excellence of the cultural complex, serving visitors with ticketing, event information, and venue guides.
Delivered in 6 months with clear budget control. The difference was accountability: one leader who could make decisions and was responsible for the outcome—no diffusion of responsibility across multiple vendors.
Needed a modern e-commerce platform—greenfield build. High transaction volumes, AI personalisation, built to scale. But the budget couldn't support London agency rates, and they didn't want to be dependent on an external vendor forever. They needed a team they could eventually own.
Delivered a production-ready platform with modern architecture. Successfully transferred operations to the client's in-house team with full documentation and training.
London agency quotes came in at 2-3x the budget. Our nearshore BOT model delivered the same quality at 50% of the cost—and they now own the team outright. No ongoing vendor dependency, no perpetual licensing. An asset, not an expense.
Renewable energy landowners were losing money—opaque payment structures, reconciliation errors nobody could track. The company had identified the market opportunity but lacked the technical capability to build the sophisticated platform required. They needed architecture, not just code.
Delivered an award-winning platform supporting landowners across the UK to maximise returns from their renewable energy projects.
The platform doesn't just track payments—it recovers money landowners didn't know they were owed. The technology directly generates revenue for clients. That's the difference between building features and building a business.
A healthcare startup with a compelling vision but no technical leadership. They needed to build a remote patient monitoring platform, navigate NHS certification, integrate IoT medical devices, and do it all within startup budget constraints. They needed a CTO—but couldn't justify a £250K+ salary.
Delivered a fully certified healthcare platform now running NHS trials at Homerton University Hospital for early patient discharge and remote monitoring.
A full-time CTO hire would have cost £250k+ annually before the company had revenue. By combining fractional leadership with nearshore delivery, we delivered CTO-level capability at a fraction of the cost—preserving runway for what matters: getting to NHS trials.